Vol. 5, No. 7 - June 5, 2007
 

Interior and Homeland Security Appropriations Bills - Update

To Members of the NASULGC System:
- Board on Agriculture Assembly
- Budget and Advocacy Committee
- Council on Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching
- Council on Governmental Affairs

As you know, in addition to the NASULGC system's funding requests for USDA-CSREES, the Budget and Advocacy Committee and the Cornerstone Team have been working for many years on other appropriations bills, including the Interior and Environment and Department of Homeland Security measures. Both of these bills have been approved in their respective subcommittees and are to be marked up in full committee this week. The report language quoted below is not expected to change.


Interior and Environment:

Forest Service R&D.
The F.Y. 2008 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill includes funding for U.S. Forest Service programs. The report to accompany this bill makes this statement about Forest Service R&D:

"Forest and rangeland research and development sponsors basic and applied scientific research. This research provides both credible and relevant knowledge about forests and rangelands and new technologies that can be used to sustain the health, productivity, and diversity of private and public lands to meet the needs of present and future generations. Research is conducted across the U.S. through six research stations, the Forest Product Laboratory, and the International Institute of Tropical Forestry in Puerto Rico, as well as cooperative research efforts with many of the Nation’s universities.

Appropriation enacted, 2007 $280,488,000
Budget estimate, 2008 263,000,000
Recommended, 2008 295,937,000
Comparison:  
Appropriation, 2007 +15,449,000
Budget estimate, 2008 +32,937,000

The Committee recommends $295,937,000 for forest and rangeland research, an increase of $32,937,000 above the budget request and $15,449,000 above the fiscal year 2007 funding level. The Committee was very concerned about the large cuts to basic and applied research sought by the Administration. Forest Service science is important, and therefore the Committee recommendation provides a $10,000,000 increase above the fiscal year 2007 enacted level to both cover fixed costs and to reestablish fundamental, core research efforts. Given this increase, the Committee anticipates that there is no need to close any existing Forest Service research facility. In addition, the Committee recommendation includes $2,500,000 as a non-specified increase for the Forest Service global climate change program. The Service should notify the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within 60 days of enactment of its desired use of these climate research funds."

The Interior and Environment Appropriations bill is scheduled to be marked up by the full House Appropriations Committee on Thursday, June 7.

DHS Appropriations:

University Based Centers of Excellence & Fellowships.
The F.Y. 2008 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations bill is scheduled to be marked up by the full House Appropriations Committee today. The report to accompany the bill contains the following language:

"The Committee recommends $48,575,000 for University programs, $9,875,000 more than requested. This level would restore funding to the fiscal year 2007 enacted level. Additional funding is critical to the success of this program because S&T will award four new University Centers of Excellence programs late in fiscal year 2007. Without additional funding, each current University Center of Excellence program would be provided with less funding in fiscal year 2008. The Committee directs S&T to report on how these additional funds will be allocated 60 days after enactment of this Act.

S&T shall report to the Committee, no later than February 1, 2008, on how the Directorate selects universities for a Center of Excellence contract award, determines the type of research in which each Center will specialize, and evaluates the quality of work received from Centers, including an evaluation of the quality of the work received to date from current Centers. As part of this report, S&T shall include an analysis of the impact a time limit may have on the quality and breadth of research conducted on behalf of the Directorate.

The Committee notes the importance of using behavioral and social sciences to detect, analyze, and better understand and prevent threats posed by terrorists and commends the Department for elevating the status of behavioral science with the establishment of a new Human Factors Division. To support this initiative, the Committee urges continued support for the University Program’s scholars and fellows program, which is critical to the development of the next generation of homeland security scientists.

The Committee has not yet approved S&T’s proposal to limit the scholars and fellows program to these Centers of Excellence. Prior to proceeding with this program change, the Committee directs S&T to contract with an independent educational organization with higher-education expertise to review the goals, objectives, size and suggested implementation of the scholars and fellows program. This review should be completed and submitted to the Committee within nine months."

National Bio and Agrodefense Facility. As you may know, the federal government has identified the need for safe, secure, and state-of-the-art biocontainment laboratories that research and develop diagnostic capabilities for foreign animal and zoonotic diseases. At present there are no facilities in the United States that are adequate to meet these national needs.

To address the issue, in January 2006 DHS and its federal partners initiated plans for a National Bio and Agrodefense Facility (NBAF) that will combine efforts of researchers from the US Department of Agriculture, the US Department of Health and Human Services, and from Homeland Security.

In March 2006, the DHS received 29 applications from states interested in hosting the NBAF. DHS announced on August 9, 2006 that the list had been narrowed to 18 potential sites representing 14 consortia. It is expected that by mid-2007 DHS will further narrow the list of candidates to a handful of sites. These sites will undergo an in-depth 18-24 month long evaluation. A final decision is expected to be made before the end of 2008. Construction of the facility will take place from 2009 to 2013.

The DHS Appropriations bill included $11 million in funding for the next stage of the NBAF project. The report states: "This funding will be used to continue environmental studies necessary to determine which site will be selected for this next-generation biological and agricultural defense facility."

The Cornerstone Team

Cornerstone Report from Washington is produced by Cornerstone Government Affairs for the Budget and Advocacy Committee of NASULGC's Board on Agriculture Assembly. © 2008 NASULGC. For more information: www.nasulgc-bac.com